Voltaire — To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize
Monday, February 11, 2013
Jews are the most over-represented group in elite college admissions (and it’s due to ethnic nepotism, not academic merit)
Black and Hispanic affirmative action has come at the expense of white admissions (not Jewish). Even if Ashkenazis have higher average IQs than whites, there are many more whites than Ashkenazis. Given a normal distribution of IQ scores, high IQ whites should outnumber Ashkenazis 7:1. Yet, there is almost a 1:1 ratio of Ashkenazis and whites at elite colleges, although Ashekanazis only make up over 2% of the population and whites 63% of the population. The nearly complete replacement of WASPs by Ashkenazis at elite institutions in the United States is one of the most revolutionary events in US history but it’s something that probably 98% of Americans are unaware of and it’s barely been discussed in the Jewish-controlled media. Whites, especially lower-income whites, tend to be the most under-represented in college admissions. When lower-class whites are matched with lower-class blacks and other non-whites the degree of the non-white advantage becomes astronomical: lower-class Asian applicants are seven times as likely to be accepted to the competitive private institutions as similarly qualified whites, lower-class Hispanic applicants eight times as likely, and lower-class blacks ten times as likely. These are enormous differences and reflect the fact that lower-class whites were rarely accepted to the private institutions surveyed. Their diversity-enhancement value was obviously rated very low. For example, at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the odds ratio favoring African Americans and Hispanics over whites was 576-to-1 and 504-to-1, respectively, using the SAT and class rank while controlling for other factors. Thus, the median composite SAT score for black admittees was 150 points lower than for whites and Asians, and the Latino median SAT score was 100 points lower. Using the ACT, the odds ratios climbed to 1330-to-1 and 1494-to-1, respectively, for African Americans and Hispanics over whites. For law school admissions, the racial discrimination found was also severe, with the weight given to ethnicity much greater than given to, for example, Wisconsin residency. Thus, an out-of-state black applicant with grades and LSAT scores at the median for that group would have had a 7 out 10 chance of admission and an out-of-state Hispanic a 1 out of 3 chance — but an in-state Asian with those grades and scores had a 1 out of 6 chance and an in-state white only a 1 out of 10 chance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/02/why-has-ron-unz-stopped-talking-about-discrimination-against-non-jewish-whites/
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/02/reply-to-unz/
http://mangans.blogspot.com/2013/02/ron-unz-on-discrimination-in-ivy-league.html
Post a Comment