Thursday, August 4, 2011

The number of Americans newly infected with HIV remained stable between 2006 and 2009, but infections rose nearly 50% among young black gay and bisexual men

While blacks represent 14% of the U.S. population, they accounted for 44% of new HIV infections in 2009. HIV infection rates among blacks were nearly eight times higher than rates in whites. Hispanics, who represent about 16% of the population, accounted for 20% of new HIV infections in 2009 - a rate that was nearly three times as high as that of whites. Men who have sex with men - which includes openly gay and bisexual men and those who do not identify themselves as gay or bisexual - remain the most heavily affected. While this group represents 2% of the overall U.S. population, they accounted for 61% of all new HIV infections in 2009. And young men who have sex with men - those aged 13 to 29 - are the hardest hit, accounting for more than one quarter of all new HIV infections nationally. New HIV infections affected young men who have sex with men of all races, but the CDC saw very sharp increases among young black men who have sex with men. What are some of the possible reasons for this racial difference? Young black men who have sex with men may be less aware of their infection status. They may encounter more homophobia than other groups, which could keep them from getting tested. They may have higher rates of other sexually transmitted diseases, which increases the risk of HIV transmission. To help fight HIV, the CDC will focus on areas where HIV infection is most heavily concentrated - among gay and bisexual men of all races, blacks and Hispanics.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is not meant to be an offensive question by any means, but how is it that there are almost no comments on this blog ?

- The news selection is worthwhile and commendable (and I'm reading a lot of similar blogs...) ;

- This blog has been going on for some time ;

- There is a large-ish blogroll ;

- It's linked to by reputable blogs of similar persuasion ;

- The comments are not even pre-moderated ;

- Similar blogs are awash with comments.

What's different here ?

David said...

Hi Robert:

I think one reason why there are so few comments on this blog compared to those of others is that this one is more a summary of news stories while the other blogs are more opinion and commentary. People are generally more likely to post a comment on a blog when they have an issue with the blogger's opinions.

Anonymous said...

I come here and then distribute the stories to as many forums/blogs, etc. as I can. IOW, I'm here for the links and then to spread the discussion out in as many places as possible.

This blog is a tremendous resource.

privateanswer said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

These are reported cases. I think if you look at the number of blacks vs the number of whites or Latinos who use free facilities such as health departments you'll find that 75% are African American. If not more. This is where how most of the information is acquired. I would.QUESS that there are far more unreported cases among white Americans than we would consider. I'm not being defensive. Blacks should be cautious. But I don't want this epidemic to creat yet another wedge between races in America.